Aug 11, 2010 at 12:52:29 PM by Stephen Danelutti - Tags: enterprise2.0 newsletter thought process business social - Comments (0)
This is a follow on from my last post and is intended to cover off a subject (social objects) that I was drawn to by Hutch Carpenter where he focuses on the Three Reasons Ideas Are Killer Social Objects for Enterprise 2.0. Like him I found the original article he refers to by Sarah Perez over at RWW a very elucidating introduction on the subject (ultimately crediting Jyri Engeström as the originator of the thought) - Building Sites Around Social Objects.
Aug 11, 2010 at 10:00:36 AM by Stephen Danelutti - Tags: enterprise2.0 newsletter thought process business social - Comments (0)
This post was prompted by the various bits of discussion I have picked up on in the last few months that try and make sense of the often confusing terminology, concepts, tools and practices that characterise the enterprise social web space. So this is an attempt to put some of those elements in place in the context of my thinking and experience :) Standard provisos apply, i.e. this is not an exhaustive set of recommendations and not set in stone - please use extreme latitude and feel free to comment and provide feedback, positive or negative.
Jul 8, 2010 at 10:06:24 AM by Stephen Danelutti - Tags: research measurement analytics B2B social media - Comments (0)
As a result of the workshop mentioned in our last post, there were quite a few queries on how social media activities could be measured and the omnipresent concern about ROI came up more than once. So we did some investigating and came up with some of the most recent thinking in this regard in the form of recent blog posts from some of the leading experts and thinkers in this field. Some have a B2B flavour since that was the predominant focus of our audience.
Please share with anyone you might think will be interested.
Jun 30, 2010 at 5:51:46 AM by Stephen Danelutti - Tags: workshops enterprise2.0 report survey - Comments (0)
On Friday the 25th of June we kicked off with our first workshop session which was kindly hosted by local business support organisation South East Business Innovation & Growth W Surrey and NE Hants. It was a resounding success in terms of attendance, participation and feedback :) This post is a report which tries to summarise the key discussions and learnings from the event in preparation for our formal workshop programmes.
"Good exploration of current technologies"
"perhaps assumed knowledge - how can one get up to speed from position of very limited knowledge and understanding of the tools"
"too fast, i was getting lost with 2nd half - this is new territory people start from different levels of expertise"
"more business case studies"
Take a look at our workshop page and why not sign-up for one of the sessions, at a time and duration that suits. Leading up to the events we'll make use of some of the tools (like Twitter and an appropriate hashtag) to collect some feedback and input prior to the actual workshops. Of course you can also add a comment in the workshop programme page. Hope to see you there!Jun 14, 2010 at 12:33:23 PM by Stephen Danelutti - Tags: newsletter enterprise2.0 science trenches innovation events documentation training - Comments (0)
This is a copy of our 6th Newsletter sent out to subscribers on the 14th June 2010.
Similar to our last newsletter, this month we're sharing snippets of discussion we've had so it is chock-full with practical stories from the trenches starting off covering Science Parks and Incubators. Ultimately, points all attempt to alleviate concerns, consider benefits and best practice, etc.
Having observed a good online ideas/innovation process already in place with a potential client, our view was it could do with a little more simplification and opening up (easier access, contribution and sharing), at least internally amongst employees to start with. Our demo site was used as an example and we have covered this before as we pointed out.
More important was deemed the context of a lot of the idea/innovation generation, aside from some good offline campaign work which was happening, i.e. the Intranet. So broader collaborative type activities that might engender more general contribution from users and ultimately new ideas/innovation.
On the Intranet side, a starting point was this overview of how a more Social Intranet might work using Confluence, the Enterprise wiki, which has a long line of customers using it in similar ways.

On the documentation front, the one very appropriate tool discussed was a wiki. The wiki was developed on the basis of documentation or collaborative authoring. So the ability to amass a large volume of reference works with the participation and contribution of a large team of people, often distributed, is what a wiki is great for (witness Wikipedia) but these days it does so much more. Also, transitioning from the wiki environment to the document production environment is well taken care of and Confluence for instance integrates very well with Microsoft Office for this. Finally, visual (pictures / graphics) aspects are easily embedded in a wiki environment and for Confluence there is even a Visio equivalent plugin called Gliffy.

The advent of Web 2.0 has brought us a dazzling array of easy-to-use social networking technologies, least of all to facilitate training. These can help trainers stay connected with learners, facilitate the growth of learning communities, and help users get into the spaces between formal training events where REAL learning often occurs. This does not even begin to consider the types of tool that Webex offer for online virtual training - something we use extensively at Netociety. With regard to actual training for the social web, we would say some training is necessary and refer to the standard technology adoption S curve but the point is that a lot of these social tools (especially wikis) are simple, including learning. Also we would recommend that activities social tools incorporate should not be seen as adding to current activities (so adding to work load) but replacing less efficient ones like collaborating via e-mail