Blog

  • Social Web and the Enterprise: Mechanics 2

    Tweet This

    Aug 11, 2010 at 12:52:29 PM by Stephen Danelutti - Tags: enterprise2.0 newsletter thought process business social - Comments (0)

    This is a follow on from my last post and is intended to cover off a subject (social objects) that I was drawn to by Hutch Carpenter where he focuses on the Three Reasons Ideas Are Killer Social Objects for Enterprise 2.0. Like him I found the original article he refers to by Sarah Perez over at RWW a very elucidating introduction on the subject (ultimately crediting Jyri Engeström as the originator of the thought) - Building Sites Around Social Objects.

    So here's my take on a whole spectrum of potential social objects (specifically for the enterprise), starting with ideas like Hutch but going beyond them. I have categorised them along a time scale starting logically with creation based business activities through implementation and utilisation. This is very much predicated on what we tried to achieve with our demo site where we focus on ideas, projects/tasks and knowledge - so along very similar lines. 


    In the diagramme above the social objects intermingle the actual object and verbs, to coin a phrase from Jyri based on the first 2 of his five key principles:

    1. Define Your Object: This is the easy part, but perhaps most important. The social object will be the center of your network. On eBay, it's whatever item you're selling or buying. On Amazon, it's a product. On Flickr, it's a photo and so on. 
    2. Define Your Verbs: This means what do you want people to do with your social object. Do you want them to comment? Rate it? Share it? Watch it? Etc. Make sure whatever action they should take is clear and highly visible on the site.
    Theres nothing more than that at this stage. I just wanted to capture this important point on social objects and plot what felt like this natural continuum for them to operate in within the enterprise. I may come back and revisit this and elaborate at some point. Feel free to add a thought of your own if mine strike a chord :)

  • Social Web and the Enterprise: Mechanics 1

    Tweet This

    Aug 11, 2010 at 10:00:36 AM by Stephen Danelutti - Tags: enterprise2.0 newsletter thought process business social - Comments (0)

    This post was prompted by the various bits of discussion I have picked up on in the last few months that try and make sense of the often confusing terminology, concepts, tools and practices that characterise the enterprise social web space. So this is an attempt to put some of those elements in place in the context of my thinking and experience :) Standard provisos apply, i.e. this is not an exhaustive set of recommendations and not set in stone - please use extreme latitude and feel free to comment and provide feedback, positive or negative.

    First lets start with a diagramme and then an elaboration of the elements in it:

    1. In the section numbered 1 we start with the basic premise that all activities should be driven by business objectives which should then be delivered against through a combination of technology, process (including the important element of metrics) and people elements. Ultimately, all other sections in this diagramme are made up of those components so lets move onto them.
    2. The second section is all about functions (with the people responsible for each) and some of the standard departments for any company (admittedly large) are listed. The important thing in this section is the clear identification of key personell responsible for driving an activity. This may seem counter-intuitive in this "wisdom of the crowds" space but I think it is really important for clear responsibility to be assigned and known. Which doesn't mean that the person/s should adopt Stalinist tendencies in control of the function - standard collaborative approaches apply for getting people participating.
    3. This section tries to plot the technology landscape:
      1. First in relation to a mix of standard business related applications as well as social. I've denoted the split in colours and chosen to categorise them as enterprise social software and traditional enterprise software but please don't hold this against me :) 
      2. I've also plotted them against the traditional web based platforms that exist within organisations (intranet, extranet and website) but here too there are no hard and fast rules and certainly in the case of enterprise applications these would most often be standalone and apart from these traditional platforms. They also do not reflect the level of integration that seems to be occurring between truly social applications and traditional enterprise applications in terms of the one adopting the others main feature sets and vice versa.
      3. Excuse the use of acronyms - herewith descriptions (crm - customer relationship management; cms - content management system; erp - enterprise resource planning). 
      4. A final point is that each application layer is multi-dimensional in terms of its area of use and I have merely tried to plot them in general terms because to plot their true area of influence/operation would make this map horribly confusing. So for example, idea management is assigned to the R&D department and mostly internally but this does not mean ideas and ultimately innovation cannot be created or managed within a broader swathe, indeed it would be more effective the broader it is, in my opinion.
    4. At the bottom of this section is a breakdown of what seems to be the 2 main category of activity in this space (Enterprise 2.0 and Social CRM) and how they fit in in terms of predominately inward or outward facing activities. In this section too is an example of a process flow with generic steps. The important point here is to break down the activities into simple process flows and most important is to set metrics against which progress can be monitored and improved.
    So thats it for now. Another further level of "mechanical perspective" will be dealt with shortly in another post. Please do let me know what you think?
  • Social Media Accountability

    Tweet This

    Jul 8, 2010 at 10:06:24 AM by Stephen Danelutti - Tags: research measurement analytics B2B social media - Comments (0)

    As a result of the workshop mentioned in our last post, there were quite a few queries on how social media activities could be measured and the omnipresent concern about ROI came up more than once. So we did some investigating and came up with some of the most recent thinking in this regard in the form of recent blog posts from some of the leading experts and thinkers in this field. Some have a B2B flavour since that was the predominant focus of our audience.

    Please share with anyone you might think will be interested.

  • Report on first social web for enterprise workshop

    Tweet This

    Jun 30, 2010 at 5:51:46 AM by Stephen Danelutti - Tags: workshops enterprise2.0 report survey - Comments (0)

    On Friday the 25th of June we kicked off with our first workshop session which was kindly hosted by local business support organisation South East Business Innovation & Growth W Surrey and NE Hants. It was a resounding success in terms of attendance, participation and feedback :) This post is a report which tries to summarise the key discussions and learnings from the event in preparation for our formal workshop programmes.

    Survey results and presentation summary

    Of the 40 or so attendees which turned up for the event, 25 responded to a survey request which was sent out 2 weeks prior to the session. That is greater than a 50% response rate and gave valuable input for the session allowing us to focus on topics highlighted as important for the attendees. The results are also rather useful and indicative since they provide a snapshot of sentiment on the subject matter and intent from local businesses so we shared them with attendees and have published them below alongside some of the points made in the presentation (just to give you a flavour). Note these are images of the slides and by clicking on the first image you can go through a slideshow:

    Feedback

    21 of the attendees filled out a response form rating the content and the presenter with some additional answers to some open ended questions on what was most valued, what actions would be taken going forward and what could be improved. For the most part we are pleased to say that the majority of the scores rating the content and presenter ranged between good and excellent :)

    Some open ended comments have been added below, verbatim:

    Most valued

    "Discussions" - It must be said there was a vast amount of open interaction, as intended, almost a form of crowdsourcing with attendees responding to each others queries - wonderfull stuff

    "Very interesting commercial applications I hadn't thought of"

    "Good exploration of current technologies"

    Actions

    "exploring internal intranet sites"

    "Develop LinkedIn and explore other ideas after  discussion. Recruit staff with expertise"

    "2x new biz ideas.  Getting active accounts across several platforms for core biz"

    Improve

    "perhaps assumed knowledge - how can one get up to speed from position of very limited knowledge and understanding of the tools"

    "too fast, i was getting lost with 2nd half - this is new territory people start from different levels of expertise"

    "more business case studies"

    Want to extend your learning?

    Take a look at our workshop page and why not sign-up for one of the sessions, at a time and duration that suits. Leading up to the events we'll make use of some of the tools (like Twitter and an appropriate hashtag) to collect some feedback and input prior to the actual workshops. Of course you can also add a comment in the workshop programme page. Hope to see you there!
  • Making the Case - Enterprise Social Web

    Tweet This

    Jun 14, 2010 at 12:33:23 PM by Stephen Danelutti - Tags: newsletter enterprise2.0 science trenches innovation events documentation training - Comments (0)

    This is a copy of our 6th Newsletter sent out to subscribers on the 14th June 2010.

    Similar to our last newsletter, this month we're sharing snippets of discussion we've had so it is chock-full with practical stories from the trenches starting off covering Science Parks and Incubators. Ultimately, points all attempt to alleviate concerns, consider benefits and best practice, etc. 

    Science Parks and Incubators


    The need for and difficulty of creating and engaging communities online (regardless of tech tools) arose repeatedly.
    1. Critical was to see the efforts as a natural compliment to physical activities and a way to scale them. 
    2. Doing it right would bear fruit but patience was required. The days of old where you might expect to "build it and they will come" are no longer appropriate, if they ever where. 
    3. Hard work seeding conversations, facilitating connections, fostering community was necessary. The end result is strengthened ties, greater trust, shared knowledge, increased and improved business, etc. 
    Several useful articles were referenced in this regard:
    LinkedIn as a tool was also looked at and conclusions were that it is as good as any other but one issue is its public nature and people's willingness, rightly or wrongly, to share info in such a public setting. Although these groups are secure, the perception might be that private networks controlled by Science Parks are better, in the form of Intranets or Extranets. 

    Crowdflo for Science Parks and Incubators

    We've just updated our offering based on a lot of insight over the last few months. Fundamentally, in order to better serve this market and expand in it, we have decided to suspended all license fees indefinitely. See our industry solution section for more on this.

    Innovation


    Having observed a good online ideas/innovation process already in place with a potential client, our view was it could do with a little more simplification and opening up (easier access, contribution and sharing), at least internally amongst employees to start with. Our demo site was used as an example and we have covered this before as we pointed out.

    More important was deemed the context of a lot of the idea/innovation generation, aside from some good offline campaign work which was happening, i.e. the Intranet. So broader collaborative type activities that might engender more general contribution from users and ultimately new ideas/innovation.

    On the Intranet side, a starting point was this overview of how a more Social Intranet might work using Confluence, the Enterprise wiki, which has a long line of customers using it in similar ways.

    Events




    The use of social media (like Meetup Everywhere and/or a wiki) to help participants get the most out of physical events was explored with the following activities deemed as necessary and useful : 

    1. An online, live update of members who will be attending the event and their areas of expertise
    2. The chance for interested parties to connect beforehand in order to prepare for a meeting at the actual event
    3. An online agenda with the chance even to shape the agenda through comments, voting, etc.
    4. The use of Twitter (and a #hashtag) before, during and after the event to track conversations, provide input, etc.
    5. A place where output from the events can be collated - videos, ideas, discussion topics, action plans, etc.
    6. A place where follow-up can be facilitated - peson to person or group chats in private areas
    7. A searchable archive of all meetings, member activities, outputs and decisions for next meetings, etc.

    Documentation and Training


    On the documentation front, the one very appropriate tool discussed was a wiki. The wiki was developed on the basis of documentation or collaborative authoring. So the ability to amass a large volume of reference works with the participation and contribution of a large team of people, often distributed, is what a wiki is great for (witness Wikipedia) but these days it does so much more. Also, transitioning from the wiki environment to the document production environment is well taken care of and Confluence for instance integrates very well with Microsoft Office for this. Finally, visual (pictures / graphics) aspects are easily embedded in a wiki environment and for Confluence there is even a Visio equivalent plugin called Gliffy


    The advent of Web 2.0 has brought us a dazzling array of easy-to-use social networking technologies, least of all to facilitate training. These can help trainers stay connected with learners, facilitate the growth of learning communities, and help users get into the spaces between formal training events where REAL learning often occurs. This does not even begin to consider the types of tool that Webex offer for online virtual training - something we use extensively at Netociety. With regard to actual training for the social web, we would say some training is necessary and refer to the standard technology adoption S curve but the point is that a lot of these social tools (especially wikis) are simple, including learning. Also we would recommend that activities social tools incorporate should not be seen as adding to current activities (so adding to work load) but replacing less efficient ones like collaborating via e-mail